Date: Mar 22, 2013 1:24 PM
Author: Ralf Bader
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
WM wrote:

> On 20 Mrz., 22:32, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote:

>> WM wrote:

>> > On 20 Mrz., 22:11, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>>

>> >> > > A set of needed lines exists.

>>

>> >> > Name the first line.

>>

>> >> One set of needed lines that exists is line 2,3,4,6,7,8...

>> >> The first line is 2.

>>

>> > This set is not a set of needed lines, because 2, 3, and all lines you

>> > mentioned are not needed lines.

>>

>> > Would you call the set 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, ... a set of natural

>> > numbers?

>>

>> > Do you get a faint idea meanwhile, what actual infinity implies?

>>

>> It certainly implies that you are an idiot. But that is not our problem.

>

> I know that there are always interesting arguments to be expected from

> your side. But in case you would not spurn to sink to the depth of

> boring simple mathematics, perhaps you have an idea to explain why

> line number 2 belongs to William's set, given above, of needed lines

> as the first one.

>

> Regards, WM

I am really sorry, but I am definitely not interested in braindead

discussions about "needed lines".