Date: Mar 22, 2013 1:24 PM
Author: Ralf Bader
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

WM wrote:

> On 20 Mrz., 22:32, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote:
>> WM wrote:
>> > On 20 Mrz., 22:11, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> >> > > A set of needed lines exists.
>>
>> >> > Name the first line.
>>
>> >> One set of needed lines that exists is line 2,3,4,6,7,8...
>> >> The first line is 2.

>>
>> > This set is not a set of needed lines, because 2, 3, and all lines you
>> > mentioned are not needed lines.

>>
>> > Would you call the set 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, ... a set of natural
>> > numbers?

>>
>> > Do you get a faint idea meanwhile, what actual infinity implies?
>>
>> It certainly implies that you are an idiot. But that is not our problem.

>
> I know that there are always interesting arguments to be expected from
> your side. But in case you would not spurn to sink to the depth of
> boring simple mathematics, perhaps you have an idea to explain why
> line number 2 belongs to William's set, given above, of needed lines
> as the first one.
>
> Regards, WM


I am really sorry, but I am definitely not interested in braindead
discussions about "needed lines".