Date: Mar 22, 2013 3:04 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224

In article 
<5192f6a9-d454-4a7c-b6b1-a6bbc5c3ff77@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 22 Mrz., 08:19, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 22, 7:38 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >


> > > This proves that we can remove all finite lines from the
> > > list without changing the contents of the remaining list.


WRONG! As usual!
> >
> > No, it only proves that you can remove any finite
> > set of lines.-

>
> And what is in your opinion beyond any finite set of lines?


That anything "beyond" a finite set of lines is not a finite set of
lines.
>
> Do you believe that induction does not hold for all natural numbers?


Inductive arguments hold for any sets that are order isomorphic to the
set of naturals.


What misleads WM to believe he is competent at mathematics, when al lthe
evidence contradicts it.
--