Date: Mar 22, 2013 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 3/22/2013 2:04 PM, Virgil wrote:
> In article
> WM <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On 22 Mrz., 08:19, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mar 22, 7:38 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>>>> This proves that we can remove all finite lines from the
>>>> list without changing the contents of the remaining list.
> WRONG! As usual!
>>> No, it only proves that you can remove any finite
>>> set of lines.-
>> And what is in your opinion beyond any finite set of lines?
> That anything "beyond" a finite set of lines is not a finite set of
>> Do you believe that induction does not hold for all natural numbers?
> Inductive arguments hold for any sets that are order isomorphic to the
> set of naturals.
> What misleads WM to believe he is competent at mathematics, when al lthe
> evidence contradicts it.
see "conceited reasoner"