Date: Mar 22, 2013 3:31 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224

In article 
<c14b377a-9857-4f4c-bfec-c0fba1b69d15@f5g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 22 Mrz., 09:14, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> > On 3/22/2013 1:55 AM, WM wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

> > > On 21 Mrz., 20:35, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> > >> On 3/21/2013 10:11 AM, WM wrote:
> >
> > >>> Induction does not need time.
> >
> > >> In
> >
> > >> news://news.giganews.com:119/f23c81fd-2463-4d3f-8df4-04799a493...@z4g2000
> > >> vbz.googlegroups.com

> >
> > >> WM wrote:
> >
> > >> ================
> > >> Everything that is in the list
> > >> 1
> > >> 1, 2
> > >> 1, 2, 3
> > >> ...
> > >> 1, 2, 3, ..., n
> > >> is in the last line. Alas as soon as you try to fix it, it is no
> > >> longer the last line.

> >
> > > The former is the position of set theory, the latter is the correct
> > > way of thinking - useful for those who can think.

> >
> > If you believe that to be the case,
> > why will you not explain the details?

>
> Because every intelligent reader has already got it.


Intelligent readers have already pegged WM as a kook and a nut.

In earlier times, WM would be one of those claiming to have trisected
angles, squared circles or duplicated cubes.


That he should be allowed to teach mathematics is a sad commentary on
the state of education.
--