Date: Mar 22, 2013 3:31 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224
In article

<c14b377a-9857-4f4c-bfec-c0fba1b69d15@f5g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 22 Mrz., 09:14, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:

> > On 3/22/2013 1:55 AM, WM wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > > On 21 Mrz., 20:35, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:

> > >> On 3/21/2013 10:11 AM, WM wrote:

> >

> > >>> Induction does not need time.

> >

> > >> In

> >

> > >> news://news.giganews.com:119/f23c81fd-2463-4d3f-8df4-04799a493...@z4g2000

> > >> vbz.googlegroups.com

> >

> > >> WM wrote:

> >

> > >> ================

> > >> Everything that is in the list

> > >> 1

> > >> 1, 2

> > >> 1, 2, 3

> > >> ...

> > >> 1, 2, 3, ..., n

> > >> is in the last line. Alas as soon as you try to fix it, it is no

> > >> longer the last line.

> >

> > > The former is the position of set theory, the latter is the correct

> > > way of thinking - useful for those who can think.

> >

> > If you believe that to be the case,

> > why will you not explain the details?

>

> Because every intelligent reader has already got it.

Intelligent readers have already pegged WM as a kook and a nut.

In earlier times, WM would be one of those claiming to have trisected

angles, squared circles or duplicated cubes.

That he should be allowed to teach mathematics is a sad commentary on

the state of education.

--