Date: Mar 22, 2013 3:33 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 3/22/2013 1:21 PM, WM wrote:
> On 22 Mrz., 16:31, William Hughes <> wrote:
>> On Mar 22, 10:05 am, WM <> wrote:

>>>> If you want to
>>>> remove all of the lines you have to remove the set of all
>>>> lines that are indexed by a natural number.

>>> But I don't want to remove a set.
>> We have the set of lines. You do not want to leave
>> any of the lines.

> I do not want this or that.
> I simply prove that for every line l_n the following property is true:
> Line l_n and all its predecessors do not in any way influence (neither
> decrease nor increase) the union of all lines, namely |N.
> This is certainly a proof that does not force us to "remove a set".
> But we can look at the set of lines that have this property. The
> result is the complete set of all lines.
> And this mathematical result cannot be violated or re-interpreted. IF
> actual infinity is true, THEN the above result is true too.
> Of course you can say that it is not a contradiction, but only counter-
> intuitive. But you cannot change the result of my proof.


He always wins at "hide and seek".

In this case "nothing to hide" is simultaneously
truthful and dishonest.