Date: Mar 22, 2013 3:33 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 3/22/2013 1:21 PM, WM wrote:

> On 22 Mrz., 16:31, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> On Mar 22, 10:05 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>>

>>>> If you want to

>>>> remove all of the lines you have to remove the set of all

>>>> lines that are indexed by a natural number.

>>

>>> But I don't want to remove a set.

>>

>> We have the set of lines. You do not want to leave

>> any of the lines.

>

> I do not want this or that.

> I simply prove that for every line l_n the following property is true:

> Line l_n and all its predecessors do not in any way influence (neither

> decrease nor increase) the union of all lines, namely |N.

>

> This is certainly a proof that does not force us to "remove a set".

> But we can look at the set of lines that have this property. The

> result is the complete set of all lines.

>

> And this mathematical result cannot be violated or re-interpreted. IF

> actual infinity is true, THEN the above result is true too.

>

> Of course you can say that it is not a contradiction, but only counter-

> intuitive. But you cannot change the result of my proof.

Proof?

He always wins at "hide and seek".

In this case "nothing to hide" is simultaneously

truthful and dishonest.