Date: Mar 22, 2013 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224
WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 22 Mrz., 08:30, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > No your proof shows that *any* *one* line
> including all its predecessors
> > can be removed from the
> > list.
> > However, you are talking about removing more
> > than one line, i,e. a *set* of lines.
> Singletons are subject to induction.
> Take the union of all singletons that are subject to my proof.
> If something remained, what could that be?
So that WM claims that when nothing remains he still has evereything?
Par for WM's courses.