Date: Mar 22, 2013 3:34 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224

In article 
<ed2f8010-620e-4029-bb7a-4ae781e2f357@m12g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 22 Mrz., 08:30, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > No your proof shows that *any* *one* line
>
> including all its predecessors
>

> > can be removed from the
> > list.
> > However, you are talking about removing  more
> > than one line, i,e. a *set* of lines.

>
> Singletons are subject to induction.
> Take the union of all singletons that are subject to my proof.
> If something remained, what could that be?


So that WM claims that when nothing remains he still has evereything?

Par for WM's courses.
--