```Date: Mar 22, 2013 3:53 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 3/22/2013 2:31 PM, Virgil wrote:> In article> <c14b377a-9857-4f4c-bfec-c0fba1b69d15@f5g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,>   WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:>>> On 22 Mrz., 09:14, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:>>> On 3/22/2013 1:55 AM, WM wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 Mrz., 20:35, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:>>>>> On 3/21/2013 10:11 AM, WM wrote:>>>>>>>>> Induction does not need time.>>>>>>>> In>>>>>>>> news://news.giganews.com:119/f23c81fd-2463-4d3f-8df4-04799a493...@z4g2000>>>>> vbz.googlegroups.com>>>>>>>> WM wrote:>>>>>>>> ================>>>>> Everything that is in the list>>>>> 1>>>>> 1, 2>>>>> 1, 2, 3>>>>> ...>>>>> 1, 2, 3, ..., n>>>>> is in the last line. Alas as soon as you try to fix it, it is no>>>>> longer the last line.>>>>>>> The former is the position of set theory, the latter is the correct>>>> way of thinking - useful for those who can think.>>>>>> If you believe that to be the case,>>> why will you not explain the details?>>>> Because every intelligent reader has already got it.>> Intelligent readers have already pegged WM as a kook and a nut.>> In earlier times, WM would be one of those claiming to have trisected> angles, squared circles or duplicated cubes.>Some of those were honest mistakes.What is going on here is not.One can only hope that, anyone reading these postswho agrees with WM as a matter of belief isrecognizing:his general lack of logical consistency,his inability to provide convincing statementsof proof when asked,his inability to justify his foundational claims,his refusal to define non-standard use of terms,his general lack of knowledge on matters thathave led to the received paradigm of modernmathematics.
```