Date: Mar 22, 2013 5:50 PM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On Mar 22, 10:42 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 22 Mrz., 22:31, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > On Mar 22, 10:14 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 22 Mrz., 21:33, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > <snip>
>
> > > > this does not mean that one can do something
> > > > that does not leave any of the lines of K
> > > > and does not change the union of all lines.

>
> > > That is clear
>
> > So stop claiming your proof
> > means you can do something
> > that does not leave any of the lines
> > of K and does not change the union
> > of all the lines.

>
> My proof is this: IF there is an actually infinite list of FISONs as I
> devised it, THEN all lines can be removed without changing the union
> of the lines.


You have shown that any FISON and all preceding
FISONs can be removed.

You have agreed that you have not shown you can do
something that does not leave a FISON
and does not change the union of all the lines.