Date: Mar 22, 2013 7:05 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 3/22/2013 5:10 PM, WM wrote:
> On 22 Mrz., 22:50, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 22, 10:42 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

>>> On 22 Mrz., 22:31, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Mar 22, 10:14 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 22 Mrz., 21:33, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> <snip>
>>
>>>>>> this does not mean that one can do something
>>>>>> that does not leave any of the lines of K
>>>>>> and does not change the union of all lines.

>>
>>>>> That is clear
>>
>>>> So stop claiming your proof
>>>> means you can do something
>>>> that does not leave any of the lines
>>>> of K and does not change the union
>>>> of all the lines.

>>
>>> My proof is this: IF there is an actually infinite list of FISONs as I
>>> devised it, THEN all lines can be removed without changing the union
>>> of the lines.

>>
>> You have shown that any FISON and all preceding
>> FISONs can be removed

>
> given the premise that set |N, the union of all FISONs, is "more" than
> every FISON.


Love the scare quotes.

Now grow up, pretend you are a mathematician,
and make the meaning of this precise.