```Date: Mar 23, 2013 9:38 AM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 3/23/2013 3:26 AM, WM wrote:> On 22 Mrz., 23:33, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:>> On Mar 22, 11:10 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22 Mrz., 22:50, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>> On Mar 22, 10:42 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:>>>>>>> On 22 Mrz., 22:31, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>> On Mar 22, 10:14 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 22 Mrz., 21:33, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>> <snip>>>>>>>>>>> this does not mean that one can do something>>>>>>>> that does not leave any of the lines of K>>>>>>>> and does not change the union of all lines.>>>>>>>>> That is clear>>>>>>>> So stop claiming your proof>>>>>> means you can do something>>>>>> that does not leave any of the lines>>>>>> of K and does not change the union>>>>>> of all the lines.>>>>>>> My proof is this: IF there is an actually infinite list of FISONs as I>>>>> devised it, THEN all lines can be removed without changing the union>>>>> of the lines.>>>>>> You have shown that any FISON and all preceding>>>> FISONs can be removed>>>>> given the premise that set |N, the union of all FISONs, is "more" than>>> every FISON.>>>>>> You have agreed that you have not shown you can do>>>> something  that does not leave a FISON>>>> and does not change the union of all the lines>>>>> Yes. And you have approved my proof. But we know both that the result>>> is wrong>>>> No, we both agree that the result is correct>> And we both agree that the result does not>> lead to a contradiction.->> So you believe that we can remove all lines without changing the> union?> Remarkable.It is not about beliefhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxastic_logic
```