Date: Mar 23, 2013 10:01 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On Mar 23, 2:43 pm, WM <> wrote:
> On 23 Mrz., 10:31, William Hughes <> wrote:

> > We both agree that you have not shown that we can
> > do something which leaves no lines and does not
> > change the union.

> No, of course we do not.

WH: this does not mean that one can do something
WH: that does not leave any of the lines of K
WH: and does not change the union of all lines.

WM: That is clear