Date: Mar 23, 2013 10:20 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On Mar 23, 3:13 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 23 Mrz., 15:01, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > On Mar 23, 2:43 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > > On 23 Mrz., 10:31, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > We both agree that you have not shown that we can
> > > > do something which leaves no lines and does not
> > > > change the union.

>
> > > No, of course we do not.
>

WH: this does not mean that one can do something
WH: that does not leave any of the lines of K
WH: and does not change the union of all lines.

WM: That is clear


> > WH: this does not mean that one can do something
>
> Of course we cannot really do infinite things. This is only an
> abbreviation.
>
> I say that there is no finite line that changes the union.


Correct

> So the union would be the same if there was no finite line.

Nope, does not follow.