Date: Mar 23, 2013 1:26 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 3/23/2013 12:23 PM, WM wrote:
> On 23 Mrz., 17:40, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>

>> The only reason you may speak of a "proof" is
>> because of the extreme patience that WH has
>> spent trying to find anything that approximates
>> rational discourse among your statements.

>
> No WH said, that the proof is correct. And every other mathematician,
> to whom I have shown this proof, has recognized it as such. It seems
> your intellect must be blamed to be too narrow to recognize the proof.
> Perhaps the reason is that you are not a mathematicain?
>

>> The only reason you may speak of a "proof" is
>> because of the extreme patience that WH has
>> spent trying to find anything that approximates
>> rational discourse among your statements.