Date: Mar 23, 2013 1:26 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 3/23/2013 12:23 PM, WM wrote:

> On 23 Mrz., 17:40, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:

>

>> The only reason you may speak of a "proof" is

>> because of the extreme patience that WH has

>> spent trying to find anything that approximates

>> rational discourse among your statements.

>

> No WH said, that the proof is correct. And every other mathematician,

> to whom I have shown this proof, has recognized it as such. It seems

> your intellect must be blamed to be too narrow to recognize the proof.

> Perhaps the reason is that you are not a mathematicain?

>

>> The only reason you may speak of a "proof" is

>> because of the extreme patience that WH has

>> spent trying to find anything that approximates

>> rational discourse among your statements.