Date: Mar 23, 2013 8:45 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224
In article <kil5sl$nd$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Sam Sung <no@mail.invalid>

wrote:

> William Hughes schrieb:

>

> > On Mar 23, 4:15 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> >> On 23 Mrz., 15:01, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >>

> >>> On Mar 23, 2:43 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> >>

> >>> > On 23 Mrz., 10:31, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >>> > > We both agree that you have not shown that we can

> >>> > > do something which leaves no lines and does not

> >>> > > change the union.

> >>

> >>> > No, of course we do not.

> >>

> >>> WH: this does not mean that one can do something

> >>> WH: that does not leave any of the lines of K

> >>> WH: and does not change the union of all lines.

> >>

> >>> WM: That is clear

> >>

> >> Please complete this sentence: "That is clear because my proof rests

> >> upon the premise that actual infinity is a meaningful notion."

> >>

> >> If actual infinity was existing as a meaningful notion, then we could

> >> remove all finite lines without changin the union in any way.

> >

> > nope

> > actual infinity existing as a meaningful notion, does not mean

> > we could remove all finite lines without changing the union

> > in any way.

> >

> > You have agreed that, "under the assumption that actual

> > infinity is a meaningful notion"

> > you have not shown that we could remove all finite lines

> > without changing the union in any way.

>

> Its always the same natural idiocy which belongs to the abhoring

> ignorant WM so each set in mathematics needs to be "constructed"

> before they "really exist" which is why this asshole feels entitled

> to expect something like a process of "reverse construction" and

> which "must be implied" in a the "natural way" that WM feels being

> the only "really truth" so the imbecile WM thinks to "win" by

> "decomposing" infinite sets into finite ones.

When it is, in fact, only WM's brain that is decomposing?

Fits the facts!

--