Date: Mar 23, 2013 8:45 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224

In article <kil5sl$nd$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Sam Sung <no@mail.invalid> 
wrote:

> William Hughes schrieb:
>

> > On Mar 23, 4:15 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >> On 23 Mrz., 15:01, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>

> >>> On Mar 23, 2:43 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >>
> >>> > On 23 Mrz., 10:31, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > > We both agree that you have not shown that we can
> >>> > > do something which leaves no lines and does not
> >>> > > change the union.

> >>
> >>> > No, of course we do not.
> >>
> >>> WH: this does not mean that one can do something
> >>> WH: that does not leave any of the lines of K
> >>> WH: and does not change the union of all lines.

> >>
> >>> WM: That is clear
> >>
> >> Please complete this sentence: "That is clear because my proof rests
> >> upon the premise that actual infinity is a meaningful notion."
> >>
> >> If actual infinity was existing as a meaningful notion, then we could
> >> remove all finite lines without changin the union in any way.

> >
> > nope
> > actual infinity existing as a meaningful notion, does not mean
> > we could remove all finite lines without changing the union
> > in any way.
> >
> > You have agreed that, "under the assumption that actual
> > infinity is a meaningful notion"
> > you have not shown that we could remove all finite lines
> > without changing the union in any way.

>
> Its always the same natural idiocy which belongs to the abhoring
> ignorant WM so each set in mathematics needs to be "constructed"
> before they "really exist" which is why this asshole feels entitled
> to expect something like a process of "reverse construction" and
> which "must be implied" in a the "natural way" that WM feels being
> the only "really truth" so the imbecile WM thinks to "win" by
> "decomposing" infinite sets into finite ones.


When it is, in fact, only WM's brain that is decomposing?
Fits the facts!
--