Date: Mar 24, 2013 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: WMytheology § 224
On 3/24/2013 4:16 AM, WM wrote:
> On 23 Mrz., 23:45, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>> Inclusion-monotonic set theory?
> No, simply a sequence of inclusion monotonic sets in ordinary set
> theory. That is nothing new.
Back to the dance.
You address no other notion of mathematical
object. You say it over and over and over
again. And, that a collection of sets of
natural numbers can be ordered into finite
initial segments has nothing to do with
the intent to make crayon marks.
Nor, for that matter, does any "ordinary