Date: Mar 24, 2013 10:17 AM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 3/24/2013 4:23 AM, WM wrote:
> On 23 Mrz., 23:58, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 23, 10:56 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>>

>>> On 23 Mrz., 21:54, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>

>>>> You have agreed that, "under the assumption that actual
>>>> infinity is a meaningful notion"
>>>> you have not shown that we could remove all finite lines
>>>> without changing the union in any way.

>>
>>> You reverse the facts.
>
> Under the assumption that actual infinity is a meaningful notion, I
> have shown that one can remove all finite lines without changing the
> union.


I must have missed that.

Why do you not write it out, once more, in plain and simple
language *of your own* right now?

Show your readers that you do not need WH to "prove" statements.