Date: Mar 24, 2013 11:30 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 24 Mrz., 16:19, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mar 24, 4:09 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

>

>

> > On 24 Mrz., 14:42, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > On Mar 24, 12:13 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > > > On 24 Mrz., 11:02, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > > > On Mar 24, 10:23 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > > > > > On 23 Mrz., 23:58, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > WH: this does not mean that one can do something

> > > > > > > WH: that does not leave any of the lines of K

> > > > > > > WH: and does not change the union of all lines.

>

> > > > > > This does not mean that one can really do so

>

> > > > > It does, however, mean that you have not shown

> > > > > that one can or cannot.

>

> > > Have you shown that "one can or cannot".

>

> > > Yes or no please.

>

> Please answer the question.

I did so. Given ZFC: one can - but in fact: one cannot.

Please answer this question (the best way for our readers to

understand the difference between pot. and act. infinity):

What is the difference between the Binary Tree that constains only all

finite paths and the Binary Tree that contains in addition all

actually infinite paths?

Regards, WM