Date: Mar 24, 2013 5:49 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 3/24/2013 4:33 PM, WM wrote:
> On 24 Mrz., 21:29, Virgil <> wrote:

>> A binary tree that contains only "all finite paths" cannot exist,
> The set of all finite paths does not exist? Neither does the set of
> all rational numbers, I presume?

> If you construct it, up to a certain
> point, suddenly all reals are there. A fascinating position.

You have been asked to define the terms of
your constructive mathematics.

You refuse.

You confuse a theory of inclusive monotonic crayon marks
with mathematics.