Date: Mar 24, 2013 7:19 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224

In article 
WM <> wrote:

> On 24 Mrz., 21:29, Virgil <> wrote:

> > A binary tree that contains only "all finite paths" cannot exist,
> The set of all finite paths does not exist?

A set of all finite paths can exist without being a binary tree

> Neither does the set of
> all rational numbers, I presume?

As usual WM presumes beyond his undersatnding.

> If you construct it, up to a certain
> point, suddenly all reals are there. A fascinating position.

But not mine.