Date: Mar 24, 2013 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224
WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 24 Mrz., 21:29, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > A binary tree that contains only "all finite paths" cannot exist,
> The set of all finite paths does not exist?
A set of all finite paths can exist without being a binary tree
> Neither does the set of
> all rational numbers, I presume?
As usual WM presumes beyond his undersatnding.
> If you construct it, up to a certain
> point, suddenly all reals are there. A fascinating position.
But not mine.