Date: Mar 25, 2013 12:42 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 3/25/2013 3:03 AM, WM wrote:

> On 24 Mrz., 23:37, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:

>> On 3/24/2013 5:01 PM, WM wrote:

>>

>>> On 24 Mrz., 22:44, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:

>>

>>>> The fact of the matter is this: you do not know

>>>> enough mathematics to do these things.

>>

>>> On 24 Mrz., 22:44, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:

>>

>>>> The fact of the matter is this: you do not know

>>>> enough mathematics to do these things.

>>

>>> A failed candídate of mathematics is certainly not in the position to

>>> judge.

>>

>> You are confused.

>>

> You are confused. Here in sci.logic, you have proved unable to

> understand Zermelo's axiom of choice, even in the English translation.

> But you have not hesitated to aske me whether I could write the

> axioms. If you could understand German, you could read them in my

> books. But since you probably would not understand either, there is no

> necessity for you to learn German. You are an impertinent fool and big

> mouth. I have no reason to answer to any of you further blatherings.

Shall we revisit all of your theories

concerning the meaning of names?

Whatever deficiencies I have are from

not being immersed in the subject matter

of mathematics for a long, long time.

My errors and my attitude toward those

errors reflect that fact.

Your errors -- such as the misrepresentation

of fact in your statement above -- derive

from the attempt to treat mathematics as a

moral crusade that justifies the rewriting

of its history.

And, we await your statement of the axioms

as requested. Feel free to fill in the

blanks.

extension:

pairing:

union:

power:

foundation:

infinity:

replacement schema:

separation schema:

choice: