Date: Mar 25, 2013 1:06 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 3/25/2013 6:41 AM, WM wrote:
> On 24 Mrz., 23:10, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>> In article
>> <44b2ec5d-75ad-4123-a50d-d6e6362c9...@u7g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
>>
>> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>>> On 24 Mrz., 16:13, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mar 24, 4:03 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>>
>>>> Induction proves that every
>>
>>>> True
>>
>>>> and all
>>
>>>> False
>>
>>> So you do no longer adhere to ZFC+FOPL?
>>
>> ZFC+FOPL? does no support WM's alleged proofs, whether by induction or
>> any other method.

>
> What axioms are mis-applied? You can find the axioms here:
> https://portal.dnb.de/opac.htm?method=showFullRecord&currentResultId=Wolfgang+M%C3%BCckenheim%26any&currentPosition=4



The existence axiom with regard to an inductive
set.

The replacement schema.