Date: Mar 25, 2013 1:22 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 3/25/2013 6:47 AM, WM wrote:

>

> For every and for all in my example are equivalent. Every and all

> elements of the inductive set of FISONs can be removed without

> changing the union, iff actual infinity exists.

This might be a plausible statement if one

confuses a closure property with the definition

of an operation.

But, only one of us is confused.

That, of course, is me since the theory of monotone

inclusive crayon marks is generally undefined except

for the "creation myth" of Hanching.

news://news.giganews.com:119/eba0cf26-b31d-4633-9732-a76bf5cc4afe@k4g2000yqn.googlegroups.com

An alleged mathematical theory with a creation myth. This

just gets better and better.