Date: Mar 25, 2013 4:54 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: WMytheology � 224

In article 
<0cfd4ed1-7b87-4e27-9b98-9b0373586e4b@p5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 24 Mrz., 23:10, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <44b2ec5d-75ad-4123-a50d-d6e6362c9...@u7g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > > On 24 Mrz., 16:13, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mar 24, 4:03 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> >
> > ZFC+FOPL? does no support WM's alleged proofs, whether by induction or
> > any other method.

>
> What axioms are mis-applied?


WM misapplies at least those axioms that, when correctly applied, prove
that actually infinite sets exist in ZFC+FOPL, sets that can be
injected into proper subsets of themselves, like the set of von Nuemann
naturals.
--