Date: Mar 28, 2013 3:34 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 233

On 3/28/2013 2:13 PM, Virgil wrote:
> In article
> <e880e3d2-4842-4e0d-9430-d3b6638d2497@u20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
> WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>

>> And the foundation of matheology is that such a node-complete tree
>> exists since the actually infinite set of all finite decimal
>> expansions exist, namely the set of all rationals that end in a
>> decimal period 000...

>
> It is WM who claims that such a tree with a path for each rational must
> exist, even though it requires the actualness of an infinity, which WM
> claims does not exist..
>
> Standard mathematics only says what must follow IF it exists.
>


Religious zealotry precludes understanding such distinctions.