Date: Mar 29, 2013 6:24 PM
Author: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Subject: Re: Using classes instead of sets

In <f8ral8lndkanp4gd70pu1fmblq4g912o74@4ax.com>, on 03/29/2013
at 06:07 AM, quasi <quasi@null.set> said:

>There are certain concepts for which sets are inadequate and classes
>come to the rescue. For example, we need the class concept if we
>want to define an equivalence on the collection of all groups, since
>that collection is not a set.


There's no such set in ZFC, but there are set theories in which it
exists aqnd is a set.

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>

Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org