Date: Mar 31, 2013 1:08 PM
Author: ross.finlayson@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On Mar 30, 10:32 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> In article

> <d3177590-1759-418a-ae12-6056d33cb...@la7g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,

> "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > On Mar 30, 6:10 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > > In article

> > > <59ee5691-c429-4fca-8638-0244afc2c...@vv1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,

> > > "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > > "Nothing" has value to some.

>

> > > But Ross's nothings do nothing for me.

> > > --

>

> > No, heh, they don't. No they don't.

>

> I rather doubt that they do much of anything for anyone but Ross.

> --

EF: a CDF of N at uniform random, f = EF(1) as p.d.f., countable

image of [0,1]

BT sweeps the tree

recently enough: field operations for the unit interval

a definition or two of continuity

let's not forget the conjecture on the Factorial/Exponential Identity

a topology for N

the mother of all wavelets

a geometry of a spiral-space filling curve as natural continuum

R as R^crown

null axiom theory

Sets, numbers, geometry: These are mathematics.

And: they're directly applied.

And: they're all very simple.

So: find an application for transfinite cardinals.

Regards,

Ross Finlayson