Date: Apr 1, 2013 4:47 PM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 1 Apr., 15:24, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 24, 7:09 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>

> > On 24 Mrz., 16:59, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 24, 4:30 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > > > > Have you shown that "one can or cannot".
>
> > > So WM has made two claims
>
> > > Given ZFC: I cannot show if one can or cannot
>
> > Wrong. Do you really find it necessary to lie in order to maintain
> > your position?

>
> WH: this does not mean that one can do something
> WH: that does not leave any of the lines of K
> WH: and does not change the union of all lines.
>
> WM: That is clear because my proof rests
> WM: upon the premise that actual infinity is a meaningful notion.


And for that case my proof is valid. So you are a liar.

Regards, WM