Date: Apr 1, 2013 4:54 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: WMytheology Sucks
In article

<3fc05a31-f311-4e96-8977-c5f4a96b7862@y9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 1 Apr., 15:24, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Mar 24, 7:09 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> >

> > > On 24 Mrz., 16:59, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >

> > > > On Mar 24, 4:30 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > > > > > > > Have you shown that "one can or cannot".

> >

> > > > So WM has made two claims

> >

> > > > Given ZFC: I cannot show if one can or cannot

> >

> > > Wrong. Do you really find it necessary to lie in order to maintain

> > > your position?

> >

> > WH: this does not mean that one can do something

> > WH: that does not leave any of the lines of K

> > WH: and does not change the union of all lines.

> >

> > WM: That is clear because my proof rests

> > WM: upon the premise that actual infinity is a meaningful notion.

>

> And for that case my proof is valid. So you are a liar.

Actually, outside of Wolkenmuekenheim, WM's claimed proofs are rarely,

if ever, valid.

And WM is hardly in a position to carp about lyings, as he is the worst

offender in this NG, with the possible exception of Arch. PLut.

--