Date: Apr 1, 2013 4:54 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: WMytheology Sucks

In article 
<3fc05a31-f311-4e96-8977-c5f4a96b7862@y9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 1 Apr., 15:24, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 24, 7:09 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >

> > > On 24 Mrz., 16:59, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Mar 24, 4:30 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Have you shown that "one can or cannot".
> >
> > > > So WM has made two claims
> >
> > > > Given ZFC: I cannot show if one can or cannot
> >
> > > Wrong. Do you really find it necessary to lie in order to maintain
> > > your position?

> >
> > WH: this does not mean that one can do something
> > WH: that does not leave any of the lines of K
> > WH: and does not change the union of all lines.
> >
> > WM: That is clear because my proof rests
> > WM: upon the premise that actual infinity is a meaningful notion.

>
> And for that case my proof is valid. So you are a liar.


Actually, outside of Wolkenmuekenheim, WM's claimed proofs are rarely,
if ever, valid.
And WM is hardly in a position to carp about lyings, as he is the worst
offender in this NG, with the possible exception of Arch. PLut.
--