Date: Apr 4, 2013 1:40 PM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On Apr 4, 6:43 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 4 Apr., 18:21, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > On Apr 4, 5:19 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > > On 4 Apr., 16:08, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > There is no need to say what numbers belong to mathematics - in
> > > mathematics. There is no need to say what paths belong to the Binary
> > > Tree

>
> > However, you keep talking about two types of paths,
>
> Not at all. I talk about sets of nodes that are in the Binary Tree.


Indeed, and some of these subsets of nodes are paths and
some are not. You talk about subsets of nodes with a last node
and subsets of nodes without a last node. However,
you refuse outright to indicate what makes a subset of nodes
a path (certainly not all subsets of nodes are paths).