Date: Apr 5, 2013 6:32 AM
Author: Tanu R.
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
WM schrieb:

> On 4 Apr., 23:08, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>> Nope. Any single element can be removed. This does not

>> mean the collection of all elements can be removed.

>

> You conceded that any finite set of lines could be removed. What is

> the set of lines that contains any finite set? Can it be finite? No.

Right.

> So the set of lines that can be removed form an infinite set.

Wrong.

> Now you

> will claim, that not all finite lines (of this infinite set that

> contains only finite lines that can be removed) can be removed.

Right, removing finite sets from infinite sets does not modify

the cardinality of finite sets.

> This is a contradiction.

Wrong, there is no finite number that specifies an infinite cardinality

thats why one cannot say: Let W=oo, for i=0...W(remove a finite subset),

because there is just no infinite index number W.

> Not to recognize it as such is madness.

You are the sick and dirty idiot - not so the rest of the world.

> But it is set theory.

Nope, but you are an disgusting asshole.

> As such madness is a prerequisite of set theory.

You are an impertinent motherfucker.