Date: Apr 5, 2013 6:32 AM
Author: Tanu R.
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
> On 4 Apr., 23:08, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Nope. Any single element can be removed. This does not
>> mean the collection of all elements can be removed.
> You conceded that any finite set of lines could be removed. What is
> the set of lines that contains any finite set? Can it be finite? No.
> So the set of lines that can be removed form an infinite set.
> Now you
> will claim, that not all finite lines (of this infinite set that
> contains only finite lines that can be removed) can be removed.
Right, removing finite sets from infinite sets does not modify
the cardinality of finite sets.
> This is a contradiction.
Wrong, there is no finite number that specifies an infinite cardinality
thats why one cannot say: Let W=oo, for i=0...W(remove a finite subset),
because there is just no infinite index number W.
> Not to recognize it as such is madness.
You are the sick and dirty idiot - not so the rest of the world.
> But it is set theory.
Nope, but you are an disgusting asshole.
> As such madness is a prerequisite of set theory.
You are an impertinent motherfucker.