```Date: Apr 5, 2013 6:32 AM
Author: Tanu R.
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

WM schrieb:> On 4 Apr., 23:08, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> >> Nope.  Any single element can be removed.  This does not>> mean the collection of all elements can be removed.> > You conceded that any finite set of lines could be removed.  What is> the set of lines that contains any finite set? Can it be finite? No.Right.> So the set of lines that can be removed form an infinite set. Wrong.> Now you > will claim, that not all finite lines (of this infinite set that> contains only finite lines that can be removed) can be removed. Right, removing finite sets from infinite sets does not modify the cardinality of finite sets. > This is a contradiction. Wrong, there is no finite number that specifies an infinite cardinality  thats why one cannot say: Let W=oo, for i=0...W(remove a finite subset), because there is just no infinite index number W. > Not to recognize it as such is madness. You are the sick and dirty idiot - not so the rest of the world. > But it is set theory. Nope, but you are an disgusting asshole. > As such madness is a prerequisite of set theory.You are an impertinent motherfucker.
```