```Date: Apr 5, 2013 5:50 PM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On Apr 5, 11:03 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 5 Apr., 21:03, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:>> > On Apr 5, 6:04 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:>> > > On 5 Apr., 12:08, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:>> > <snip>>> > > > There is an infinite set of lines D> > > > such that any finite subset of D can be removed.>> > > What has to remain?>> > This depends on the finite subset removed.> > If the finite set removed is E then> > D\E has to remain.>> Is E restricted to an upper threshold?> If not, how do you prove its finiteness?The number of elements in E is a natural number.No upper limit, but finite.>> >  Note that whatever> > subset E is chosen the number of lines> > in D\E is infinite  (but of course we> > do not know which lines are in D\E).>> Can you prove for at least one fixed line that it cannot be removed?> If not, why do you think that some (even infinitely many) lines must> remain?> Don't you feel a bit ridiculous, when you again and again claim> infinitely many natural numbers none of which you can name?>Not at all.  Consider a set of natural numbers G.Let G be       all odd numbers   or       all even numbersThen G has an infinite number ofelements, but you cannot name a single element of G.
```