Date: Apr 5, 2013 6:12 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224

In article 
<f5967d16-5eda-4a94-8b9f-0a0f57aeb7f0@r7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 5 Apr., 21:03, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 5, 6:04 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> >

> > > On 5 Apr., 12:08, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >

> > > > There is an infinite set of lines D
> > > > such that any finite subset of D can be removed.

> >
> > > What has to remain?
> >
> > This depends on the finite subset removed.
> > If the finite set removed is E then
> > D\E has to remain.  Note that whatever
> > subset E is chosen the number of lines
> > in D\E is infinite

>
> How do you call a set E the number of elements exceeds any given
> natural number?


Infinite!
>
> >  (but of course we
> > do not know which lines are in D\E).

>
> How do we call a set when we cannot biject it with a FIS on |N?


Infinite!


Another of WM's silly false arguments deleted!
--