Date: Apr 5, 2013 8:04 PM
Author: namducnguyen
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 05/04/2013 5:55 PM, Virgil wrote:

> In article <YaJ7t.99953$8d.75210@newsfe14.iad>,

> Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen@shaw.ca> wrote:

>

>> On 05/04/2013 5:24 PM, fom wrote:

>>> On 4/5/2013 3:52 PM, WM wrote:

>>>

>>>> Do you reject mathematics in favour of matheology?

>>>

>>> The only theology here is to be found in WM's theocracy of one.

>>

>> There exists such a thing as a mathematical theology: the mathematical

>> concept of the natural numbers, as "the standard structure" for the

>> language of arithmetic.

>

> One may question whether there should be an infinite totality of natural

> numbers, but to consider them all to be "non-standard" in mathematics

> seems a bit much.

I didn't say anything about "non-standard".

The point I'd like to bring across is to _declare_ them be "standard",

or even "non-standard" is to be anti mathematical logic: the natural

numbers, together with their collective standardness or

non-standardness, is a _non-logical_ concept. As such, they'd have

no final say in logical reasoning as we've tended to _believe_ after

1931.

--

----------------------------------------------------

There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity.

NYOGEN SENZAKI

----------------------------------------------------