Date: Apr 6, 2013 3:29 AM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224

In article <A2P7t.14440$yV1.13813@newsfe29.iad>,
Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen@shaw.ca> wrote:

> On 06/04/2013 12:08 AM, Virgil wrote:
> > In article <bWN7t.281592$O52.191417@newsfe10.iad>,
> > Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen@shaw.ca> wrote:
> >

> >> On 05/04/2013 10:31 PM, Virgil wrote:
> >>> In article <VFM7t.356449$PC7.98356@newsfe03.iad>,
> >>> Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen@shaw.ca> wrote:
> >>>

> >>>> Then you don't seem to understand the nature of cGC, depending on the
> >>>> formulation of the Conjecture but being a _different_ formula.
> >>>>
> >>>> For GC (the Goldbach conjecture), there naturally are 2 cases:

> >>>
> >>> What if the GC is eventually proved true in all systems?

> >>
> >> What do you mean by "all" systems?

> >
> > At least all systems in which a set of positive naturals with the usual
> > forms of addition and multiplication are possible.

>
> What do you mean by "positive naturals", "usual forms", "possible"?
> That's way too "intuitive" to conclude anything definitely, right?


The naturals nowadays can either include zero or not, and zero is not a
positive natural.

Are you really not familiar with the usual forms of addition and
multiplication as they are understood for natural numbers?
--