Date: Apr 6, 2013 3:29 AM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224
In article <A2P7t.14440$yV1.13813@newsfe29.iad>,

Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen@shaw.ca> wrote:

> On 06/04/2013 12:08 AM, Virgil wrote:

> > In article <bWN7t.281592$O52.191417@newsfe10.iad>,

> > Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen@shaw.ca> wrote:

> >

> >> On 05/04/2013 10:31 PM, Virgil wrote:

> >>> In article <VFM7t.356449$PC7.98356@newsfe03.iad>,

> >>> Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen@shaw.ca> wrote:

> >>>

> >>>> Then you don't seem to understand the nature of cGC, depending on the

> >>>> formulation of the Conjecture but being a _different_ formula.

> >>>>

> >>>> For GC (the Goldbach conjecture), there naturally are 2 cases:

> >>>

> >>> What if the GC is eventually proved true in all systems?

> >>

> >> What do you mean by "all" systems?

> >

> > At least all systems in which a set of positive naturals with the usual

> > forms of addition and multiplication are possible.

>

> What do you mean by "positive naturals", "usual forms", "possible"?

> That's way too "intuitive" to conclude anything definitely, right?

The naturals nowadays can either include zero or not, and zero is not a

positive natural.

Are you really not familiar with the usual forms of addition and

multiplication as they are understood for natural numbers?

--