Date: Apr 6, 2013 4:29 PM
Author: namducnguyen
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 06/04/2013 2:08 PM, WM wrote:
> On 6 Apr., 20:34, Nam Nguyen <> wrote:

>>> Every counterexample of GC, if existing, is a fixed natural number.
>>> But I do not pretend that I know such an SS...S0. And that statement
>>> with, say 42, does not play a role in my arguing.

>>> ~GC <==> Counter example with a fixed n in |N exists. <==>
>>> Fixed n in |N can be found. ==> Goldbach conjecture is decidable.

>> You're incorrect in that:
>> ~GC is syntactically of the form Ex[P(x)]. No "fixed n" is required. Period.

> Try to understand mathematical contents, not "syntactic form".
> You may use n or x or y or what you like. If you have been taught that
> different names like x and SS...S0 change anything of relevance in
> mathematics, then you should try to get your tuition fees back.
> Simply try to apply some common sense!

Ah! So, there's such a FOL reasoning rule called the "Rule of Common
Sense" after all!

No wonder that my persuasion has been in vain.

There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity.