Date: Apr 7, 2013 12:58 PM
Author: namducnguyen
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 07/04/2013 10:31 AM, Nam Nguyen wrote:
> On 06/04/2013 4:04 PM, Frederick Williams wrote:
>> Nam Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/04/2013 6:22 AM, Frederick Williams wrote:

>>>> Nam Nguyen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/04/2013 10:55 PM, fom wrote:

>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who knows what is and what is not -- even
>>>>>> in the simple realm of mathematics -- claims
>>>>>> a certain knowledge that is revealed rather
>>>>>> than discerned.

>>>>>
>>>>> So, since Godel, is the knowledge of the natural numbers
>>>>> a revealed or discerned one?
>>>>>
>>>>> Revealed by whom? Discerned from what?

>>>>
>>>> Why do you write "since Godel"? What is his relevance to the matter?
>>>>

>>>
>>> There's no point for technically discussing (or arguing) with you,
>>> in any thread.

>>
>> So you don't know what G\"odel's relevance is?

>
> Don't pretend I didn't have a valid reason why I refuse to technically
> argue with you on matters related to language structure such as GIT.
>
> I do.


Until you acknowledge you understand that my finite structure M1 is
a FOL structure, it's _pointless for both you and me to talk_ about
anything related to structure, such as the natural numbers, Godel's
Incompleteness, etc...

--
----------------------------------------------------
There is no remainder in the mathematics of infinity.

NYOGEN SENZAKI
----------------------------------------------------