Date: Apr 7, 2013 9:39 PM
Author: William Elliot
Subject: Re: some amateurish opinions on CH
On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, fom wrote:

> 1)

>

> A new axiom or set of axioms not directly asserting the continuum

> hypothesis would be required.

No, there's an old axiom, Occam's Razor.

> 2)

>

> Arguments to the effect that the existing theory failed to properly

> represent standard mathematical practice would be required

>

> 3)

>

> A proof

Yes. Assume not GCH. Thus there's myriads of superfluously conceptual

infinite cardinals As this violates Occam's Razor, GCH, QED.

Similarly Occam's Razor shows there's no inaccessible cardinals.