Date: Apr 17, 2013 11:37 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
In article

<f39de9da-0beb-4db8-a66f-6ab4ae8c0291@h9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 13 Mrz., 20:13, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> 1

> 2 1

> 3 2 1

> ...

>

> >

> > The set of even naturals do not fit in one such finite line

>

>

> It seems that there are only finite lines. And never two or more lines

> contain more than one of them. This is simply fact.

Any two lines contain more that the first of them.

>

> > if we note

> > that given any even natural, there is another larger than it. And for

> > every even number that WM claims is a last/largest one, others can find

> > another yet later/larger.

>

> But in actual infinity the set is complete.

But not cut off.

> That means that we cannot

> find further naturals.

Since we already have for any one another which is further, we do not

need anything more 'further' than we already have.

> All is in te list and, by construction, never

> in more than one line.

The next line is always more that any one line can be.

--