Date: Apr 17, 2013 11:37 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article 
<f39de9da-0beb-4db8-a66f-6ab4ae8c0291@h9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 13 Mrz., 20:13, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:


> 1
> 2 1
> 3 2 1
> ...


>
> >
> > The set of even naturals do not fit in one such finite line

>
>
> It seems that there are only finite lines. And never two or more lines
> contain more than one of them. This is simply fact.


Any two lines contain more that the first of them.
>
> > if we note
> > that given any even natural, there is another larger than it. And for
> > every even number that WM claims is a last/largest one, others can find
> > another yet later/larger.

>
> But in actual infinity the set is complete.


But not cut off.


> That means that we cannot
> find further naturals.


Since we already have for any one another which is further, we do not
need anything more 'further' than we already have.



> All is in te list and, by construction, never
> in more than one line.


The next line is always more that any one line can be.
--