Date: May 3, 2013 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 258
In article <email@example.com>,
Zeit Geist <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > If your "Y c X" in the above means that Y is PROPER subset of X ( a
> > subset of X but not equal to X) then your statement is quite correct,
> > but the "Y c X" notation is not always interpreted as requiring "not
> > equal to".
> Thanks Virgil,
> I realized that I didn't mention that. That is how I usually interpret it,
> but not everyone does. Of course, things get interpreted rather
> strangely around here.
Which is why I try to be as precise and clear as possible.
But no matter how hard I try, WM, for one, manages to both misinterpret
and misrepresent what I have said.