Date: May 6, 2013 3:08 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 258

In article 
<7130e63b-0e2e-4a6c-987c-0f249c3a9e9a@dl10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 6 Mai, 17:31, Dan <dan.ms.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > The list is of non-terminating decimals (actual real numbers) .
>
> Their indices are natural numbers.
> The indices of the digits 1 are finite initial sequences of real
> numbers.
> Do you agree?


With such nonsense? Never!
>
> > What you need isn't what the argument is . The fact that the
> > asymmetry  is blatant could be made evident to a fifth grader .

>
> The fact that both, reals and naturals, are in the list and can be
> used according to my taste should be obvious to such a grader too.


Except that WM's "Taste" only runs to misuse of them.

Or
> do you think that only men of genious can recognize that principle?

It would take more than genius to find any prnciple in that.
>
> > And , for one
> > who knows to walk them properly, it's those bridges that lead to


The levels of mathematics that WM can never reach.
--