Date: May 8, 2013 4:18 AM
Author: Torsten
Subject: Re: complicated equation including bessel functions
"ghasem " <shaban_sadeghi@yahoo.com> wrote in message <kmbkid$pni$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>...

> Hi.

> how solve an complicated equation including bessel functions,when my unknown and my initial guesses are complex?

> my code is as following: (is within a for loop)

>

> syms bet % bet is my unknown

> for i = 1: 100

> % eps1 , k1,k2,k0 are complex constant.

> gam = sqrt(bet^2 - k1^2);

> T = sqrt(bet^2 - k2^2);

> tau = sqrt(bet^2 - k0^2);

> %

> X1 = gam*besseli(0,gam);

> X2 = T*(eps1*besseli(1,gam)-(1-eps1)*gam.*besseli(0,gam));

>

> X3 = -T*tau*bessely(0,T)*besselk(1,tau)-...

> tau^2*bessely(1,T)*besselk(0,tau);

> X4 = -T*tau*besselj(0,T)*besselk(1,tau)-...

> tau^2*besselj(1,T)*besselk(0,tau);

>

> exp1(i) = X1.*(besselj(1,T).*X3 - bessely(1,T).*X4)-...

> X2.*(besselj(0,T).*X3 - bessely(0,T).*X4);

>

> my_guess = (i/100) +1j*(k0+(i/m));

> exp2(i) = fsolve(@(bet)eval(exp1(i)),guess);

>

> real_ans(i) = real(exp2(i));

> imag_ans(i)= imag(exp2(i));

> end

> ====================================

> I think that fsolve is not exact.because my answers are not simillar to my reference.

> is there any better method,instead fsolve?

> ghasem

What variables are changed within your for-loop ?

The complex constants eps1, k0, k1 and k2 ?

Best wishes

Torsten.