Date: May 15, 2013 2:53 AM
Author: David Bailey
Subject: Re: Work on Basic Mathematica Stephen!
On 13/05/2013 08:48, Murray Eisenberg wrote:> Well put: "ephemera in

ephemera out."

>

> As a possible, simple-minded explanation of what WRI is up to: surely

they're faced at any given time with a given customer base. To gain new

customers, they need to add new areas of applicability, whether through

adding them directly to Mathematica or by creating new Mathematica-based

products.

>

................................

>> Mathematics and Mathematica are intrinsically difficult enough as it is.

>> That makes it all the more important that WRI present users with a

stable,

>> robust, easy to use basic interface. WRI had not done the best job they

>> could at this and not what one would expect for a relatively expensive

>> product.

>>

>>

>> David Park

I think there is a serious problem faced by many software developers who

have a stable product evolved over many versions.

They simply have to go on innovating, even if the changes don't make a

lot of sense - because otherwise, why should users pay for expensive

upgrades?

Many people prefer earlier versions of Microsoft Office, and a great

many people avoid Windows 8. I think there is a warning here for WRI.

I almost think there is a case for a clean-up version of Mathematica

that sorts out a whole variety of irritations (everyone probably has a

different list) such as:

1) No multi-level UNDO!

2) Glitches associated with the startup of Mathematica.

3) A review of the Dynamic system so as to make it really robust.

4) Not enough control of error messages (e.g. the cut off after 4

messages of a particular type).

etc.

Perhaps WRI should create that list of cleanup tasks by consulting its

user base!

After the cleanup version, it might make sense to pause for a while, and

just do bug fixes.

David Bailey

http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk