Date: May 25, 2013 12:47 AM Author: Bart Goddard Subject: Re: An Unheralded Breakthrough: The Rosetta Stone of Mathematics 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space998@hotmail.com> wrote in news:ae93e4f1-
> true, but he retracted that
> in a letter to a Canadian in Quebec.
>> Fermat was incorrect in asserting that 2^(2^n)+1 would always be
And, therefore, your assertion is false. End of nonsense.