Date: May 25, 2013 12:47 AM
Author: Bart Goddard
Subject: Re: An Unheralded Breakthrough: The Rosetta Stone of Mathematics

1treePetrifiedForestLane <> wrote in news:ae93e4f1-

> true, but he retracted that
> in a letter to a Canadian in Quebec.

>> Fermat was incorrect in asserting that 2^(2^n)+1 would always be
>> prime.

And, therefore, your assertion is false. End of nonsense.