Date: May 25, 2013 1:43 AM Author: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Subject: Maxwell Equations as axioms over all of physics and math #9 Textbook<br> 2nd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept Alright, I am learning more new things, for in this 2nd edition I have

an alternative to the picketfence model. I have the pure and straight

rectangle model and the pure and straight triangle. In the rectangle

model we fill the dx of 10^-603 width and the height is y itself. In

the pure triangle we have a right triangle on the leftside of the

point of the graph and the same triangle on the rightside with its

hypotenuse in the reverse direction as pictured like this:

/|

/ |

/ __|

unioned with this triangle

|\

| \

|__\

is the same area as the rectangle model of the point on the function

graph.

The problem, though, is that the angle of the hypotenuse does not like

like the slope or tangent to the point of that function graph. So I

need to see if that hypotenuse is related to the slope or tangent or

derivative at that specific point. If it is, then, clearly we see how

derivative is the inverse of integral, because both have the same area

and the triangle hypotenuse would be the derivative. So instead of

rectangles forming the integral we can take two triangles. So

hopefully I can work this out in the 3rd edition which I plan to start

in the next day or so.

Alright, this is the 10th page of the 2nd edition and the last page. I

want to devote the last page to showing how all this math is begot

from the Maxwell Equations.

Now on this last page I want to show how Calculus of its empty space

between successive numbers is derived from the Maxwell Equations as

the ultimate axiom set over all of mathematics. The Maxwell Equations

derives the Peano axioms and the Hilbert axioms. But I want to show

that the Maxwell Equations do not allow for the Reals to be a

continuum of points in geometry but rather, much like the integers,

where there is a empty space between successive integers.

The Reals that compose the x-axis of 1st quadrant are these:

0, 1*10^-603, 2*10^-603, 3*10^-603, 4*10^-603, 5*10^-603,

6*10^-603 . . on up to 10^603

Pictorially the Reals of the x-axis looks like this

...................>

and not like this

____________>

So in the Maxwell Equations we simply have to ask, is there anything

in physics that is a continuum or is everything atomized with empty

space in between? Is everything quantized with empty space in

between?

I believe the answer lies with the Gauss law of electricity, commonly

known as the Coulomb law. The negative electric charge attracts the

positive electric charge, yet with all that attraction they still must

be separated by empty space. If there was a continuum of matter in

physics, then the electron would be stuck to the proton. The very

meaning of quantum mechanics is discreteness, not a continuum.

Discreteness means having holes or empty space between two particles

interacting of the Maxwell Equations.

So if physics has no material continuum, why should a minor subset of

physics-- mathematics have continuums. If Physics does not have

something, then mathematics surely does not have it.

Now I end with reminders for the 3rd edition:

REMINDERS:

(1) First page talk about why Calculus exists as an operator of

derivative versus integral much the same way of add subtract or of

multiply divide because in a Cartesian Coordinate System the number-

points are so spaced and arranged in order that this spatial

arrangement yields an angle that is fixed. So that if you have an

identity function y = x, the position of points (1,1) from (2,2) is

always a 45 degree angle. So Calculus of derivative and integral is

based on this fact of Euclidean Geometry that the coordinates are so

spatially arranged as to yield a fixed angle. Numbers forming fixed

angles gives us Calculus.

(2) Somewhere I should find out if the picketfence model is the very

best, for it maybe the case that a rectangle model versus a pure

triangle model may be better use of the empty space of 10^-603 between

successive Reals (number points). The picketfence model is good, but

it never dawned on me until now that there is likely a better model

even yet-- pure rectangle versus two pure triangles. My glitch is to

get the hypotenuse related to the derivative. If I can solve that

glitch, I have a crystal clear understanding of the derivative,

integral and why they are inverses.

(3) I am really excited about that new method of arriving at the

infinity borderline of Floor-pi*10^603 via Calculus. The first number

which allows a half circle function to be replaced by a 10^1206

derivatives of tiny straight line segments and still be a truncated

regular polyhedra, is when pi has those 603 digits rightward of the

decimal point. The derivative of half circles of any number smaller

than Floor-pi*10^603 does not form a circle. And is that not what

Calculus is all about in the first place-- taking curves and finding

Euclidean straight line segments as derivative and area. Calculus is

the interpretation of curved lines into straight line segments. So,

onwards to 3rd edition.

--

More than 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google

newsgroups author search archive from May 2012 to May 2013. Drexel

University's Math Forum has done a far better job and many of those

missing Google posts can be seen here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium

http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium

whole entire Universe is just one big atom

where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies