```Date: Jun 11, 2013 9:09 AM
Author: Nasser Abbasi
Subject: Re: The Charlwood Fifty, another Macsyma result

On 6/11/2013 6:37 AM, clicliclic@freenet.de wrote:>> For FriCAS you have listed problem #5 as both "did" and "did not".>opps, sorry, typo. Fricas "did not" do 5.> It would be informative if you could signal non-elementary answers by> putting the corresponding problem numbers in parentheses, say.Sure. A quick look shows that of those solved, #5 by Rubiand Maple had non-elementary anti-derivative (Elliptic function) inthem. This is the one Mathematica, Sage and FriCAS did notgive an answer for.In #6,#7,#8,#9 Mathematica gave non-elementary anti-derivative (also usingElliptic functions).If I overlooked something, please feel free to correct, allother anti-derivative are using elementary function as far as Isee (exp, log, radicals, trig and inverse trigs and +,-,/,*)Here is an updated score table using your proposed notation:1. Mathematica: did 1,2,3,4,(6),(7),(8),(9),10  did not: 52. Maple: did 1,2,3,4,(5),6,7,8                 did not: 9,103. Rubi4: did 2,4,(5),6,7,8,9,10                did not: 1,34. Sage: did: 1,2,3,7,9                         did not: 4,5,6,8,105. Fricas: did 1,2,3,4,6,7,10                   did not: 5,8,9ps. I moved Sage's 4 from the "did" to the "did not" since theanswer still contained another integral in it, so to befair to other CAS's it should have been counted as "did not".sorry Sage :(thanks,--Nasser
```