Date: Jun 12, 2013 5:27 PM
Author: Scott Berg
Subject: Re: WMytheology ???


"Virgil" <virgil@ligriv.com> wrote in message
news:virgil-D57CCD.14452612062013@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM...
> In article <fb67bf00-769a-40a4-892c-6ae4dc56c04f@googlegroups.com>,
> mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:
>

>> On Wednesday, 12 June 2013 18:06:40 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:
>>

>> > > > > And for which k do you fail to well-order by size all rationals
>> > > > > which have (m + n) < k? > It will fail at no k, all k are

>> natural
>> > > > > numbers. It will fail for the set of all natural numbers.
>>
>> My proof does not concern "the set of all natural numbers" whatever you
>> may
>> understand by and expect from that phrase. My proof concerns "all natural
>> numbers" and "all rational numbers" without any exception.

>
> and your "proofs" are mere 'poofs' outside the wild weird world of
> WMytheology


many 'spoofs' are written by 'poofs'

>>
>> If your "sets" are different or more, then I am not interested

>
> Then we are not interested in your wild weird world of WMytheology
> either.


his spoof concerns the set of all non-irrational numbers and finiting it,
somecow.

> --
>
>