Date: Jun 12, 2013 5:27 PM
Author: Scott Berg
Subject: Re: WMytheology ???
"Virgil" <email@example.com> wrote in message
> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
> email@example.com wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 12 June 2013 18:06:40 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:
>> > > > > And for which k do you fail to well-order by size all rationals
>> > > > > which have (m + n) < k? > It will fail at no k, all k are
>> > > > > numbers. It will fail for the set of all natural numbers.
>> My proof does not concern "the set of all natural numbers" whatever you
>> understand by and expect from that phrase. My proof concerns "all natural
>> numbers" and "all rational numbers" without any exception.
> and your "proofs" are mere 'poofs' outside the wild weird world of
many 'spoofs' are written by 'poofs'
>> If your "sets" are different or more, then I am not interested
> Then we are not interested in your wild weird world of WMytheology
his spoof concerns the set of all non-irrational numbers and finiting it,