Date: Jun 13, 2013 10:09 AM
Author: BruceS
Subject: Re: Sound, semantically complete, categorical theory of arithmetic

On 06/13/2013 02:53 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:
> On Jun 13, 1:43 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On 06/11/2013 03:47 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

>>> On Jun 12, 7:38 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 06/11/2013 01:57 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Jun 12, 2:10 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/10/2013 06:50 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 11, 9:55 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 06/10/2013 04:01 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>> On Jun 11, 12:30 am, Peter Percival wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I think I am an Elephant,
>>>>>>>>>> Behind another Elephant
>>>>>>>>>> Behind /another/ Elephant who isn't really there....
>>>>>>>>>> A.A. Milne

>>
>>>>>>>>> http://phpprolog.com/nat-s-s-dog.png
>>
>>>>>>>> OK, but have you paid Brad that $1000 you owe him? Given your abject
>>>>>>>> poverty, you could just start paying him $1 per week, to at least show
>>>>>>>> good faith. If you could afford it, maybe you could even make it $2 on
>>>>>>>> a good week.

>>
>>>>>>> Didn't you follow misc.legal?
>>
>>>>>>> Brad posted his 1st Question at the exact same minute that
>>>>>>> I posted Qualifying comments about the bet that it must be
>>>>>>> paypaled $1000 up front by him!

>>
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298
>>>>>>> BRAD
>>>>>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>>>>>> Word One
>>>>>>> page 106 line 27

>>
>>>>>>> *************
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41
>>>>>>> HERC
>>>>>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>>>>>> What?
>>>>>>> You can paypal up front if you want
>>>>>>> Herc

>>
>>>>>>> Maybe if you 2 were a minute quicker or you didn't give away clues
>>>>>>> during a mindreading test we could have completed it!

>>
>>>>>> You're changing the story *again*? Surely you jest. You offered a bet
>>>>>> on another of your tests, claiming it was set such that you couldn't
>>>>>> back out once it began. Brad accepted that bet. You then tried some
>>>>>> sort of side bet, which he rejected. You acted as if that meant he'd
>>>>>> backed out of the test and original bet, at which point he made it clear
>>>>>> that he hadn't, and had in fact started the test. You then proceeded
>>>>>> with the test, demonstrating that you understood the bet was still in
>>>>>> force. Partway through the test, you read a thread that clearly
>>>>>> indicated you shouldn't read it (because of your repeated whinges about
>>>>>> your magic powers getting "distracted"), and as a result you threw a
>>>>>> tantrum and quit. You owe Brad $1000. You know it, I know it, everyone
>>>>>> who cares to read the relevant threads knows it. Nobody *really*
>>>>>> trusted you before, but now, instead of a suspicion that you wouldn't
>>>>>> follow through on your promises, we have proof that you're a liar and a
>>>>>> fraud. You have no honor. Nobody trusts you.

>>
>>>>> Here are the relevant threads.
>>
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298
>>>>>> BRAD
>>>>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>>>>> Word One
>>>>>> page 106 line 27
>>>>>> *************
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41
>>>>>> HERC
>>>>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>>>>> What?
>>>>>> You can paypal up front if you want
>>>>>> Herc

>>
>>>> Oh yeah, just keep spinning and spinning. You're not fooling anyone,
>>>> you know.

>>
>>>>> Having honour in your eyes is like having a fat bum at a gay bar.
>>
>>>> I realize that you have some strange fantasies, but I don't even know
>>>> what you mean by this one. You should keep your sexual habits to
>>>> yourself. In fact, I wonder if you're an Aries. This week's horoscope
>>>> for Aries (from America's Finest News Source, the best source for
>>>> horoscopes) seems particularly apt:
>>>> "Sometimes in life, you just need to stop whatever it is you're doing
>>>> and take a step back. Actually, maybe it's two steps back. Yeah, that's
>>>> good. Keep going. The stars will let you know when you're far enough."

>>
>>> The number 1 symptom of denial is citation blindness.
>>
>> So, does that mean you're not going to take the stars' advice?
>>

>>> https://groups.google.com/group/aus.tv/msg/b0c7ab3af05af298
>>
>>>>>> BRAD
>>>>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>>>>> Word One
>>>>>> page 106 line 27
>>>>>> *************

>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/3c647092c1abbc41
>>
>>>>>> HERC
>>>>>> More options Dec 31 2012, 3:41 pm
>>>>>> What?
>>>>>> You can paypal up front if you want
>>>>>> Herc

>>
>> Does it make you feel better to keep quoting brief bits of these threads?
>>

>
>
> Have you not seen ROCKY II ?
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0L-jcBtCrrA
>
>
>
> 2 men go down... I gets up..
>
> Wait that was CON AIR!
>
> Or try the start of Rocky III.... DING... DING!


You seem to be getting even less coherent than usual. Did you forget to
turn off the gas on your camp stove?