Date: Jun 20, 2013 2:25 PM
Author: FredJeffries@gmail.com
Subject: Re: WMytheology § 293
On Jun 20, 11:22 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 20 Jun., 19:34, FredJeffries <fredjeffr...@gmail.com>

>

> > Speaking of taking the union of a sequence is gibberish. Treating a

> > sequence of sets as a set of sets is the work of a chowderhead, a

> > clown

> > or a charlatan.

>

> Isn't a sequence of X an ordered set of X without repetitions? In

> particular an inclusion monotonic strictly increasing sequence is an

> ordered set.

>

> Regards, WM

No. A sequence is a function with domain the natural numbers.