Date: Jun 20, 2013 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: WMytheology § 293
On Jun 20, 11:22 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 20 Jun., 19:34, FredJeffries <fredjeffr...@gmail.com>
> > Speaking of taking the union of a sequence is gibberish. Treating a
> > sequence of sets as a set of sets is the work of a chowderhead, a
> > clown
> > or a charlatan.
> Isn't a sequence of X an ordered set of X without repetitions? In
> particular an inclusion monotonic strictly increasing sequence is an
> ordered set.
> Regards, WM
No. A sequence is a function with domain the natural numbers.