Date: Jun 27, 2013 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 295
On 6/27/2013 4:26 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 June 2013 02:12:17 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:
> > 1/aleph_0 is not defined.
> Let X > 100 ==> 1/X < 1.
> aleph_0 > 100 is defined.
This is when sympathy for your
students is evoked.
It is one thing to speak of
"strokes-as-numerals" and mimic
arguments that are in the literature.
It is a different thing to work without
axioms or logic and mangle different