Date: Jun 27, 2013 5:52 AM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 295

On 6/27/2013 4:26 AM, mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 June 2013 02:12:17 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:
> > 1/aleph_0 is not defined.
>
> Let X > 100 ==> 1/X < 1.
> aleph_0 > 100 is defined.
>


This is when sympathy for your
students is evoked.

It is one thing to speak of
"strokes-as-numerals" and mimic
arguments that are in the literature.

It is a different thing to work without
axioms or logic and mangle different
subjects senselessly.