Date: Jul 15, 2013 8:03 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 300
On 7/15/2013 4:09 PM, mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:

> On Monday, 15 July 2013 21:44:37 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:

>> On Monday, July 15, 2013 12:40:03 PM UTC-7, muec...@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:

>>> Let the sets where they belong, namely in matheology. Let's talk math, namely about numbers. They are all finite and in finite sets. Any exception known?

>

>> That is your prerogative. Use any consistent you wish. But be aware that you may implicitly cross the line into the infinite without knowing it.

>

> There is no line to cross. Every natural number belongs to a finite set. Have you really become so brain-damaged during your study that you can't understand this simple fact? There is no material in mathematics that could "cross the line to infinity". Infinity cannot be reached. Then it would be finity.

>

This is only an argument to use

the correct term -- transfinite.

Now you will point out Cantor's

metaphysical beliefs to justify

your agenda...

... and so it goes ...

... and so it goes ...

... and so it goes ...

... and so it goes ...

... and so it goes ...

...